Re: Substituting Checksum Algorithm (was: Enabling Checksums) - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Simon Riggs
Subject Re: Substituting Checksum Algorithm (was: Enabling Checksums)
Date
Msg-id CA+U5nMJStyjqp9xSKSgRL_c9t+mYb8H9WsJ1TmBAgFK8Ao-eaw@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Substituting Checksum Algorithm (was: Enabling Checksums)  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
On 30 April 2013 15:51, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> Simon Riggs <simon@2ndQuadrant.com> writes:
>> ISTM that we also need this patch to put memory barriers in place
>> otherwise the code might be rearranged.
>
> This is simply silly.

You crack me up sometimes. Yes, it is; seem to be having a bad day for thinkos.

--Simon Riggs                   http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Substituting Checksum Algorithm (was: Enabling Checksums)
Next
From: Greg Stark
Date:
Subject: Re: Back branches vs. gcc 4.8.0