Re: Streaming-only Remastering - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Simon Riggs
Subject Re: Streaming-only Remastering
Date
Msg-id CA+U5nMJHAd1TPzZLuhnordBZB8FAy4HBE5PxzfpysU+fTkN2hA@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Streaming-only Remastering  (Joshua Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>)
Responses Re: Streaming-only Remastering  (Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net>)
Re: Streaming-only Remastering  (Daniel Farina <daniel@heroku.com>)
Re: Streaming-only Remastering  (Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On 10 June 2012 19:47, Joshua Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com> wrote:

> So currently we have a major limitation in binary replication, where it is not possible to "remaster" your system
(thatis, designate the most caught-up standby as the new master) based on streaming replication only.  This is a major
limitationbecause the requirement to copy physical logs over scp (or similar methods), manage and expire them more than
doublesthe administrative overhead of managing replication.  This becomes even more of a problem if you're doing
cascadingreplication. 

The "major limitation" was solved by repmgr close to 2 years ago now.
So while you're correct that the patch to fix that assumed that
archiving worked as well, it has been possible to operate happily
without it.

http://www.repmgr.org

New versions for 9.2 will be out soon.

--
 Simon Riggs                   http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
 PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: libpq compression
Next
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: libpq compression