Re: archive_keepalive_command - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Simon Riggs
Subject Re: archive_keepalive_command
Date
Msg-id CA+U5nMJ6L0YSWapLkHji8To2ffL606yNhDF06DfxyFjJvnX3kg@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: archive_keepalive_command  (Jeff Janes <jeff.janes@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: archive_keepalive_command
List pgsql-hackers
On Sun, Mar 4, 2012 at 1:20 AM, Jeff Janes <jeff.janes@gmail.com> wrote:

> Does this patch have any user-visible effect?  I thought it would make
> pg_last_xact_replay_timestamp() advance, but it does not seem to.  I
> looked through the source a bit, and as best I can tell this only sets
> some internal state which is never used, except under DEBUG2

Thanks for the review. I'll look into that.

--
 Simon Riggs                   http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
 PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Scaling XLog insertion (was Re: Moving more work outside WALInsertLock)
Next
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: Our regex vs. POSIX on "longest match"