Re: pgaudit - an auditing extension for PostgreSQL - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Simon Riggs
Subject Re: pgaudit - an auditing extension for PostgreSQL
Date
Msg-id CA+U5nM+yE97aFgpui7MtQHrn8XvhYYOW2FNrVb5x_=0isjEEaQ@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: pgaudit - an auditing extension for PostgreSQL  (Abhijit Menon-Sen <ams@2ndQuadrant.com>)
Responses Re: pgaudit - an auditing extension for PostgreSQL  (Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net>)
List pgsql-hackers
On 27 December 2014 at 08:47, Abhijit Menon-Sen <ams@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:

> But there's no way to say *don't* audit select on foo by simon.

We can cover what it does and does not do in some doc examples.

When submitted, pgaudit didn't have very complex auditing rules.
Stephen's suggestion improves that considerably, but isn't the only
conceivable logging rule. But we'll need to see what else is needed; I
doubt we'll need everything, at least not in PG9.5

-- Simon Riggs                   http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Stephen Frost
Date:
Subject: Re: CATUPDATE confusion?
Next
From: Stephen Frost
Date:
Subject: Re: pgaudit - an auditing extension for PostgreSQL