Re: unite recovery.conf and postgresql.conf - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Simon Riggs
Subject Re: unite recovery.conf and postgresql.conf
Date
Msg-id CA+U5nM+hgas3Jv2kMbJ2nRiKwxiMA7CArzf4uu0UW3DnR6u9jg@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: unite recovery.conf and postgresql.conf  (Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>)
Responses Re: unite recovery.conf and postgresql.conf  (Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>)
Re: unite recovery.conf and postgresql.conf  (Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Tue, Oct 11, 2011 at 9:28 PM, Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> wrote:

> Standard conforming strings
> was tricky because it was more user-facing, or certainly SQL-facing.

Why is SQL more important than backup?

There is no good reason to do this so quickly.

--
 Simon Riggs                   http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
 PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: Dumping roles improvements?
Next
From: "Kevin Grittner"
Date:
Subject: Re: Overhead cost of Serializable Snapshot Isolation