Re: CLOG contention - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Simon Riggs
Subject Re: CLOG contention
Date
Msg-id CA+U5nM+TOBYrEg+KpsrVNpxeRj2c5QA5Cuh4atZPuzyMj2rRCA@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: CLOG contention  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Fri, Jan 6, 2012 at 3:55 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> Simon Riggs <simon@2ndQuadrant.com> writes:
>> Please can we either make it user configurable?
>
> Weren't you just complaining that *I* was overcomplicating things?
> I see no evidence to justify inventing a user-visible GUC here.
> We have rough consensus on both the need for and the shape of a formula,
> with just minor discussion about the exact parameters to plug into it.
> Punting the problem off to a GUC is not a better answer.

As long as we get 32 buffers on big systems, I have no complaint.

I'm sorry if I moaned at you personally.

--
 Simon Riggs                   http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
 PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: Poorly thought out code in vacuum
Next
From: Peter Geoghegan
Date:
Subject: Re: Progress on fast path sorting, btree index creation time