Re: Vacuum/visibility is busted - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Simon Riggs
Subject Re: Vacuum/visibility is busted
Date
Msg-id CA+U5nM+Aw_RiDA7mnqUCBHoPfLr04p9__fqbSRntUehwv9eybw@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Vacuum/visibility is busted  (Jeff Janes <jeff.janes@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On 7 February 2013 05:39, Jeff Janes <jeff.janes@gmail.com> wrote:

> While stress testing Pavan's 2nd pass vacuum visibility patch, I realized
> that vacuum/visibility was busted.  But it wasn't his patch that busted it.
> As far as I can tell, the bad commit was in the range
> 692079e5dcb331..168d3157032879

Please define "busted" so we can all help track this down.

-- Simon Riggs                   http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Michael Paquier
Date:
Subject: Re: Support for REINDEX CONCURRENTLY
Next
From: Simon Riggs
Date:
Subject: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Fast promote mode skips checkpoint at end of recovery.