On 15 October 2014 21:03, Claudio Freire <klaussfreire@gmail.com> wrote:
>> So you're familiar then with this process? So you know that an auditor
>> would trigger an investigation, resulting in deeper surveillance and
>> gathering of evidence that ends with various remedial actions, such as
>> court. How would that process start then, if not this way?
>
> I've seen lots of such investigations fail because the evidence wasn't
> strong enough to link to a particular person, but rather a computer
> terminal or something like that.
So your solution to the evidence problem is to do nothing? Or you have
a better suggestion?
Nothing is certain, apart from doing nothing.
-- Simon Riggs http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
