Re: Separating bgwriter and checkpointer - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Simon Riggs
Subject Re: Separating bgwriter and checkpointer
Date
Msg-id CA+U5nM+-az=FXLnJUsEorTZSsapA=eOCG+HKBWo-hxpAVTH6Zw@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Separating bgwriter and checkpointer  ("Dickson S. Guedes" <listas@guedesoft.net>)
Responses Re: Separating bgwriter and checkpointer
List pgsql-hackers
On Wed, Oct 5, 2011 at 5:10 AM, Dickson S. Guedes <listas@guedesoft.net> wrote:

> Ah ok! I started reviewing the v4 patch version, this is my comments:

...

> Well, all the tests was running with the default postgresql.conf in my
> laptop but I'll setup a more "real world" environment to test for
> performance regression. Until now I couldn't notice any significant
> difference in TPS before and after patch in a small environment. I'll
> post something soon.

Great testing, thanks. Likely will have no effect in non-I/O swamped
environment, but no regression expected either.

--
 Simon Riggs                   http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
 PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Alex Hunsaker
Date:
Subject: Re: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Force strings passed to and from plperl to be in UTF8 encoding.
Next
From: Greg Smith
Date:
Subject: Re: Displaying accumulated autovacuum cost