Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Use a bitmask to represent role attributes - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Robert Haas
Subject Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Use a bitmask to represent role attributes
Date
Msg-id CA+Tgmobz5PzBYvTZErv3Hxw-gERbPx=w9T4+OxwD-f73zDjpYQ@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Use a bitmask to represent role attributes  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Use a bitmask to represent role attributes  (Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Tue, Dec 23, 2014 at 10:51 AM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> Meh.  To the extent that users look at pg_roles rather than pg_authid,
> it's going to look like another 15 boolean columns to them anyway ...
> except that now, those columns are suddenly a lot more expensive to read.

Ugh.  I think that's actually a really good point.  I guess I'll +1
reverting this, then.

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: José Luis Tallón
Date:
Subject: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Use a bitmask to represent role attributes
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Use a bitmask to represent role attributes