Re: spinlock->pthread_mutex : first results with Jeff's pgbench+plsql - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Robert Haas
Subject Re: spinlock->pthread_mutex : first results with Jeff's pgbench+plsql
Date
Msg-id CA+TgmobxZPiC1ejY4Z3EoiSD8B+FFcvGF_DF5JPXzATTq9BkaA@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: spinlock->pthread_mutex : first results with Jeff's pgbench+plsql  (Nils Goroll <slink@schokola.de>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Mon, Jul 2, 2012 at 11:38 AM, Nils Goroll <slink@schokola.de> wrote:
>> 3.1.7?
>
> Sorry, that was a typo. 9.1.3.
>
> Yes, I had mentioned the Version in my initial posting. This version is the one
> I need to work on as long as 9.2 is beta.
>
>> A major scalability bottleneck caused by spinlock contention was fixed
>> in 9.2 - see commit b4fbe392f8ff6ff1a66b488eb7197eef9e1770a4.  I'm not
>> sure that it's very meaningful to do performance testing on versions
>> that are known to be out of date.
>
> Apparently I have not pointed this out clearly enough. Sorry.

You might try back-porting that one commit and see whether it fixes
your problem.

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Nils Goroll
Date:
Subject: Re: spinlock->pthread_mutex : first results with Jeff's pgbench+plsql
Next
From: David Fetter
Date:
Subject: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Make walsender more responsive.