Re: Finer Extension dependencies - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Robert Haas
Subject Re: Finer Extension dependencies
Date
Msg-id CA+TgmobvmikM6G4ET_uAbFgJQ4QZu+MChrMFy9_3Rffk=ONSoQ@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Finer Extension dependencies  (Dimitri Fontaine <dimitri@2ndQuadrant.fr>)
Responses Re: Finer Extension dependencies  (Dimitri Fontaine <dimitri@2ndQuadrant.fr>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Wed, Mar 28, 2012 at 12:11 PM, Dimitri Fontaine
<dimitri@2ndquadrant.fr> wrote:
>> On a more prosaic note, you seem to have made a mistake when
>> generating the v5 diff.  It includes reverts of a couple of unrelated,
>> recent patches.
>
> Ouch. It seems to happen to me too often. I probably need to get the
> shallow clones setup where you have different directories hosting each a
> different git branch so that you don't need to checkout just to update
> your local master, etc.

Could you possibly generate a new diff to save me the trouble of
fixing the one you sent before?

>>> WTF? WTF?
>>
>> On a further note, I have spent a heck of a lot more time reviewing
>> other people's patches this CommitFest than you have, and I don't
>> appreciate this.  If you'd rather that I didn't spend time on this
>> patch, I have plenty of other things to do with my time.
>
> Sorry about that. I'm on a crazy schedule and too tired, and I wanted to
> be sure to attract your attention on a misunderstanding here. It's also
> not clear to me what level of language WTF really is, or “dude” to take
> another example. I'll be sure not to use that again when I aim at being
> polite yet dense.

I don't seriously feel that "WTF" is unacceptable language for a
public mailing list populated mostly by hackers; I try not to use it
myself, but I'm not puritanical enough to get annoyed with other
people for doing so.  I was reacting to the overall tone rather than
that specific expression.  And I can sympathize with the crazy
schedule and too tired thing; I have been there.

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Magnus Hagander
Date:
Subject: Re: max_files_per_process ignored on Windows
Next
From: Peter Geoghegan
Date:
Subject: Re: Re: pg_stat_statements normalisation without invasive changes to the parser (was: Next steps on pg_stat_statements normalisation)