On Mon, Nov 25, 2024 at 5:52 PM David Rowley <dgrowleyml@gmail.com> wrote:
> OK, thanks. I likely took your neutrality here in a more positive
> light after reading the 4-year-old message at [1]. That probably
> wasn't the right thing to do.
Yeah, I think my view has wavered over time. Probably when I wrote
that message I had recently seen some cases where the additional
detail would have been helpful; but as of this writing the cases I've
seen most recently are those where the output is mind-numbingly long
already.
--
Robert Haas
EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
