Re: REFERENCES privilege should not be symmetric (was Re:[GENERAL] Postgres Permissions Article) - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Robert Haas
Subject Re: REFERENCES privilege should not be symmetric (was Re:[GENERAL] Postgres Permissions Article)
Date
Msg-id CA+Tgmobst9385gWq3g3LPkNn0NkbRk0CWPQD5YH1p2J6MaVJLQ@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to REFERENCES privilege should not be symmetric (was Re: [GENERAL] Postgres Permissions Article)  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-general
On Thu, Mar 30, 2017 at 4:45 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> In short, it seems like this statement in the docs is correctly describing
> our code's behavior, but said behavior is wrong and should be changed.
> I'd propose fixing it like that in HEAD; I'm not sure if the back branches
> should also be changed.

Sounds reasonable, but I don't see much advantage to changing it in
the back-branches.

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company


pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Thomas Kellerer
Date:
Subject: Do I need to COMMIT an analyze statement?
Next
From: Thorsten Glaser
Date:
Subject: Re: Debian Bug#859033: pg_dump: creates dumps that cannot berestored