Re: Refactoring the checkpointer's fsync request queue - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Robert Haas
Subject Re: Refactoring the checkpointer's fsync request queue
Date
Msg-id CA+TgmobqzMkSnWBHcTYqxwQhL3MahX-cpWzs2sVJ4219ciAYGA@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Refactoring the checkpointer's fsync request queue  (Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>)
Responses Re: Refactoring the checkpointer's fsync request queue
List pgsql-hackers
On Fri, Mar 1, 2019 at 12:43 PM Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> wrote:
> Obviously it's nicer looking this way, but OTOH, that means we have to
> send more data over the queue, because we can't easily combine the
> request + "owner". I don't have too strong feelings about it though.

Yeah, I would lean toward combining those.

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Andres Freund
Date:
Subject: Re: Infinity vs Error for division by zero
Next
From: Adrien NAYRAT
Date:
Subject: Re: Log a sample of transactions