Re: pg_stats_recovery view - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Robert Haas
Subject Re: pg_stats_recovery view
Date
Msg-id CA+TgmobqmDUr-JpSB=Es8FHPtn=Z4mjNhKAEDG6nPjp_n66qZQ@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: pg_stats_recovery view  (Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Fri, Mar 9, 2012 at 7:20 AM, Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 4:10 PM, Jaime Casanova <jaime@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
>> On Thu, Feb 2, 2012 at 2:32 AM, Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net> wrote:
>>>
>>> I haven't looked through the code in detail, but one direct comment:
>>> do we really need/want to send this through the stats collector? It
>>> will only ever have one sender - perhaps we should just either store
>>> it in shared memory or store it locally and only send it on demand?
>>>
>>
>> fyi, i intend to send a reworked patch later today, it will store the
>> info locally and send it on demand.
>
> Jaime,
> are you planning to submit the updated version of the patch?

Hearing no response, I have marked this patch Returned with Feedback.

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Simon Riggs
Date:
Subject: Re: Faster compression, again
Next
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: logging in high performance systems.