Re: [multithreading] extension compatibility - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Robert Haas
Subject Re: [multithreading] extension compatibility
Date
Msg-id CA+Tgmobq2d8_CtOKYbLu68+-Ra6q7Z_03U7Dc-EPn9y-9m2S3g@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [multithreading] extension compatibility  (Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>)
Responses Re: [multithreading] extension compatibility
List pgsql-hackers
On Wed, Jun 5, 2024 at 10:09 PM Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> wrote:
> Maybe. I think shipping a mode where users can fairly simply toggle between
> threaded and process mode will allow us to get this stable a *lot* quicker
> than if we distribute two builds. Most users don't build from source, distros
> will have to pick the mode. If they don't choose threaded mode, we'll not find
> problems. If they do choose threaded mode, we can't ask users to switch to a
> process based mode to check if the problem is related.

I don't believe that being coercive here is the right approach. I
think distros see the value in compiling with as many things turned on
as possible; when they ship with something turned off, it's because
it's unstable or introduces weird dependencies or has some other
disadvantage.

--
Robert Haas
EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Andres Freund
Date:
Subject: Re: [multithreading] extension compatibility
Next
From: Peter Smith
Date:
Subject: Re: 001_rep_changes.pl fails due to publisher stuck on shutdown