Postgres Pro
Downloads
Home   >   mailing lists

Re: [HACKERS] Declarative partitioning vs. sql_inheritance - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Robert Haas
Subject Re: [HACKERS] Declarative partitioning vs. sql_inheritance
Date
Msg-id CA+Tgmobny++=MQDvR__kPDOSO6Z_7E-yz+QVTSrGomusXp6uBA@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] Declarative partitioning vs. sql_inheritance  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Tree view 
On Fri, Dec 16, 2016 at 2:34 PM, David Fetter <david@fetter.org> wrote:
> It occurs to me this probably isn't the only GUC that's basically just
> a foot gun at this point.
>
> Is 10 a good time to sweep and clear them?

We never make any progress trying to do these things "in bulk".  If
you think there are other GUCs that need to be removed, start a thread
for each one, or closely related group, and let's talk about it on the
merits.  On this thread, let's just decide whether or not to remove
sql_inheritance.

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: David Fetter
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Declarative partitioning vs. sql_inheritance
Next
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] PSQL commands: \quit_if, \quit_unless