Re: [HACKERS] Transactions involving multiple postgres foreign servers - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Robert Haas
Subject Re: [HACKERS] Transactions involving multiple postgres foreign servers
Date
Msg-id CA+Tgmobmq0wvQzPXdONgnB5_UV2pRq+w9=ai=d9faJJuQHvovw@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] Transactions involving multiple postgres foreign servers  (Masahiko Sawada <sawada.mshk@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: [HACKERS] Transactions involving multiple postgres foreign servers  (Masahiko Sawada <sawada.mshk@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Mon, Jan 30, 2017 at 2:30 AM, Masahiko Sawada <sawada.mshk@gmail.com> wrote:
> "txn" can be used for abbreviation of "Transaction", so for example
> pg_fdw_txn_resolver?
> I'm also fine to change the module and function name.

If we're judging the relative clarity of various ways of abbreviating
the word "transaction", "txn" surely beats "x".

To repeat my usual refrain, is there any merit to abbreviating at all?Could we call it, say, "fdw_transaction_resolver"
or
"fdw_transaction_manager"?

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] logical decoding of two-phase transactions
Next
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] multi-level partitions and partition-wise joins