On Sun, Oct 19, 2014 at 12:27 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> writes:
>>> But TBH I suspect 95% of the problems here would vanish if smart
>>> shutdown weren't the default ...
>
>> But for your repeated objections, we would have changed the default to fast years ago. AFAICT everyone else is in
favorof that.
>
> I've certainly objected to it in the past, but I don't believe
> I was the only one objecting.
What's your feeling now?
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
