Re: Parallel safety tagging of extension functions - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Robert Haas
Subject Re: Parallel safety tagging of extension functions
Date
Msg-id CA+TgmobiMg+xebeyO-j_yx+Wm_7vuXmmJ4A6JHP7qWA4v8z3fQ@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Parallel safety tagging of extension functions  (Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: Parallel safety tagging of extension functions  (Andreas Karlsson <andreas@proxel.se>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Fri, May 20, 2016 at 11:45 PM, Michael Paquier
<michael.paquier@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Sounds to me that this is part of the cleanup of a 9.6 feature and should be
>> in that release.
>
> Yes, I agree. By the way, the patch completely ignores the fact that
> some of the modules already had a version bump in the 9.6 development
> cycle, like pageinpect. You don't need to create a new version script
> in such cases.

I think now that beta1 has shipped we would want to bump the version either way.

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "David G. Johnston"
Date:
Subject: Re: [BUGS] BUG #14155: bloom index error with unlogged table
Next
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: Parallel safety tagging of extension functions