Re: patch for new feature: Buffer Cache Hibernation - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Robert Haas
Subject Re: patch for new feature: Buffer Cache Hibernation
Date
Msg-id CA+Tgmobhd=r229U1KYPOR0OQg3v6+qaN3skf4OA3BO432OZzAw@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: patch for new feature: Buffer Cache Hibernation  (Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>)
Responses Re: patch for new feature: Buffer Cache Hibernation  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Fri, Oct 14, 2011 at 11:12 AM, Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> wrote:
> OK.  But if we are pretty sure we don't want something, e.g. hibernate,
> we shouldn't add it.

Fair enough, but I'm not even slightly sure that we don't want that.
I think having prewarming utilities available as contrib modules or on
PGXN would be useful, but integrating something into the backend would
allow it to be far more automated.

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: pg_comments (was: Allow \dd to show constraint comments)
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: patch for new feature: Buffer Cache Hibernation