Re: [GENERAL] currval and DISCARD ALL - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Robert Haas
Subject Re: [GENERAL] currval and DISCARD ALL
Date
Msg-id CA+Tgmobgzxgc-0ti3nLUa1SipU=Hk+FxOAbKComyy3p6aAEozg@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [GENERAL] currval and DISCARD ALL  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Fri, Apr 19, 2013 at 11:09 AM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com> writes:
>> It seems a bad idea to backpatch this; whoever wants this functionality
>> in back branches should probably run a patched server.
>
> Surely this is 9.4 material at this point in any case.

I don't know why this couldn't be slipped into 9.3; we have done worse
later.  But I don't have a personal stake in it either, and will
certainly defer to whatever the consensus is.

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Merlin Moncure
Date:
Subject: Re: question about postgres storage management
Next
From: Christopher Browne
Date:
Subject: Re: question about postgres storage management