Re: [HACKERS] 64-bit queryId? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Robert Haas
Subject Re: [HACKERS] 64-bit queryId?
Date
Msg-id CA+TgmobgPRWAskapWyVv87he+1TBhFZDrwHBMpK3djgFJzkHow@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] 64-bit queryId?  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Sat, Sep 30, 2017 at 12:03 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> More to the point: with 32-bit IDs, it's apparent that you shouldn't
> really rely on them being unique, and should design your usage so that
> it will survive collisions.

But the point is precisely that we do not do that.  pg_stat_statements
"survives" collisions, but nothing good happens.

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company


-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Andres Freund
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] 64-bit queryId?
Next
From: Peter Geoghegan
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Re: CREATE COLLATION does not sanitize ICU's BCP 47language tags. Should it?