Re: [PATCH] Windows port, fix some resources leaks - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Robert Haas
Subject Re: [PATCH] Windows port, fix some resources leaks
Date
Msg-id CA+TgmobgCUY53tomz=PC8uRAdvC7TRYuC=Txe3Gy8m7yXZXMHA@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [PATCH] Windows port, fix some resources leaks  (Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>)
Responses Re: [PATCH] Windows port, fix some resources leaks  (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>)
Re: [PATCH] Windows port, fix some resources leaks  (Ranier Vilela <ranier.vf@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Fri, Jan 24, 2020 at 2:13 AM Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz> wrote:
> No, that's not right.  I think that it is possible to loop over
> ShmemProtectiveRegion in some cases.  And actually, your patch is dead
> wrong because this is some code called by the postmaster and it cannot
> use FATAL.

Uh, really? I am not aware of such a rule.

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Removing pg_pltemplate and creating "trustable" extensions
Next
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: Removing pg_pltemplate and creating "trustable" extensions