Re: WAL format and API changes (9.5) - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Robert Haas
Subject Re: WAL format and API changes (9.5)
Date
Msg-id CA+Tgmobfy2XbMBuz6+jN+HAoaDBHJKi7T+LpG6JFPYojzOihZA@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to WAL format and API changes (9.5)  (Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnakangas@vmware.com>)
Responses Re: WAL format and API changes (9.5)  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Thu, Apr 3, 2014 at 10:14 AM, Heikki Linnakangas
<hlinnakangas@vmware.com> wrote:
> (Instead of using a new XLogRegisterBuffer() function to register the
> buffers, perhaps they should be passed to XLogInsert as a separate list or
> array. I'm not wedded on the details...)

That would have the advantage of avoiding the function-call overhead,
which seems appealing.

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Воронин Дмитрий
Date:
Subject: Re: Fwd: SSL auth question
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Fwd: SSL auth question