Re: [HACKERS] Declarative partitioning - another take - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Robert Haas
Subject Re: [HACKERS] Declarative partitioning - another take
Date
Msg-id CA+TgmobfABZ8xEs9pmHxJm46YoBJdoBbDFzQBRFBAyrqHaBUhQ@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] Declarative partitioning - another take  (Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8@lab.ntt.co.jp>)
Responses Re: [HACKERS] Declarative partitioning - another take  (Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8@lab.ntt.co.jp>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Tue, Apr 25, 2017 at 10:34 PM, Amit Langote
<Langote_Amit_f8@lab.ntt.co.jp> wrote:
> FWIW, I too prefer the latter, that is, fire only the parent's triggers.
> In that case, applying only the patch 0001 will do.

Do we need to update the documentation?

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Masahiko Sawada
Date:
Subject: [HACKERS] Fix a typo in worker.c
Next
From: Peter Geoghegan
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] Incremental sort