Re: [HACKERS] The case for removing replacement selection sort - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Robert Haas
Subject Re: [HACKERS] The case for removing replacement selection sort
Date
Msg-id CA+TgmobdEW0FKon7y53317WQ8ujaetJ1kOao+a-=q=GqHyba+w@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] The case for removing replacement selection sort  (Tomas Vondra <tomas.vondra@2ndquadrant.com>)
Responses Re: [HACKERS] The case for removing replacement selection sort  (Peter Geoghegan <pg@bowt.ie>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Thu, Sep 7, 2017 at 5:38 PM, Tomas Vondra
<tomas.vondra@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
> Do we need/want to repeat some of that benchmarking on these patches? I
> don't recall how much this code changed since those benchmarks were done
> in the 9.6 cycle.

+1 for some new benchmarking.  I'm all for removing this code if we
don't need it any more, but it'd be a lot better to have more numbers
before deciding that.

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Parallel worker error
Next
From: Magnus Hagander
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] GnuTLS support