Re: [HACKERS] Parallel bitmap heap scan - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Robert Haas
Subject Re: [HACKERS] Parallel bitmap heap scan
Date
Msg-id CA+TgmobaS7sOpFjwoVKREJWrpuca3RfOdtWTpUd40eO9+8+NdA@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] Parallel bitmap heap scan  (Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: [HACKERS] Parallel bitmap heap scan  (Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Tue, Feb 28, 2017 at 9:18 PM, Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut@gmail.com> wrote:
> 0001- same as previous with some changes for freeing the shared memory stuff.
> 0002- nodeBitmapHeapScan refactoring, this applies independently
> 0003- actual parallel bitmap stuff applies on top of 0001 and 0002

0002 wasn't quite careful enough about the placement of #ifdef
USE_PREFETCH, but otherwise looks OK.  Committed after changing that
and getting rid of the local variable prefetch_iterator, which seemed
to be adding rather than removing complexity after this refactoring.

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Ashutosh Bapat
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Print correct startup cost for the group aggregate.
Next
From: David Steele
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] ALTER DEFAULT PRIVILEGES with GRANT/REVOKE ON SCHEMAS