Re: TRUE/FALSE vs true/false - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Robert Haas
Subject Re: TRUE/FALSE vs true/false
Date
Msg-id CA+Tgmoba-ZN2SQuWV8sy3_tYzKsUio=94+EufSnamj45DunJ8A@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: TRUE/FALSE vs true/false  (Boszormenyi Zoltan <zb@cybertec.at>)
Responses Re: TRUE/FALSE vs true/false
List pgsql-hackers
On Thu, Aug 4, 2011 at 8:44 AM, Boszormenyi Zoltan <zb@cybertec.at> wrote:
> 2011-08-04 14:32 keltezéssel, Robert Haas írta:
>> 2011/8/4 Boszormenyi Zoltan <zb@cybertec.at>:
>>> Shouldn't these get fixed to be consistent?
>> I believe I already did.  See commit 85b436f7b1f06a6ffa8d2f29b03d6e440de18784.
>
> I meant a mass "sed -e 's/TRUE/true/g'  -e 's/FALSE/false/g'" run
> so all the ~200 occurrences of both "TRUE" and "FALSE" get
> converted so the whole source tree is consistent.

Oh, I see.  Well, I don't care either way, so I'll let others weigh
in.  The way it is doesn't bother me, but fixing it doesn't bother me
either.

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Boszormenyi Zoltan
Date:
Subject: Re: TRUE/FALSE vs true/false
Next
From: Hannu Krosing
Date:
Subject: plperl crash with Debian 6 (64 bit), pl/perlu, libwww and https