Re: [HACKERS] Surjective functional indexes - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Robert Haas
Subject Re: [HACKERS] Surjective functional indexes
Date
Msg-id CA+Tgmob_qk-w38Mbp5wCCGH9G8AFpmB0K0aTLujJqHNbBpBNUA@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] Surjective functional indexes  (Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com>)
Responses Re: [HACKERS] Surjective functional indexes  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Fri, May 11, 2018 at 11:01 AM, Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
>>> I have no problem if you want to replace this with an even better
>>> design in a later release.
>>
>> Meh. The author / committer should get a patch into the right shape
>
> They have done, at length. Claiming otherwise is just trash talk.

Some people might call it "honest disagreement".

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Amit Langote
Date:
Subject: Re: Should we add GUCs to allow partition pruning to be disabled?
Next
From: Amit Langote
Date:
Subject: \d doesn't show partitioned table foreign keys