Re: TAP test breakage on MacOS X - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Robert Haas
Subject Re: TAP test breakage on MacOS X
Date
Msg-id CA+TgmobZvbT7ZcD8xNuCRybrd1wgTq64PE9wG+YKBXJrbj09dg@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: TAP test breakage on MacOS X  (Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Mon, Nov 3, 2014 at 4:44 PM, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net> wrote:
> On 10/29/14 8:42 AM, Robert Haas wrote:
>> I'm sympathetic to that line of reasoning, but I really think that if
>> you want to keep this infrastructure, it needs to be made portable.
>
> Let me clarify that this was my intention.  I have looked at many test
> frameworks, many of which are much nicer than what we have, but the
> portability and dependency implications for this project would have been
> between shocking and outrageous.  I settled for what I felt was the
> absolute minimum: Perl + IPC::Run.  It was only later on that I learned
> that 1) subtests don't work in Perl 5.10, and 2) subtests are broken in
> Perl 5.12.  So we removed the use of subtests and now we are back at the
> baseline I started with.

Thanks.  At last check, which I think was approximately last week, the
tests were running and passing on my machine.

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Alvaro Herrera
Date:
Subject: Re: tracking commit timestamps
Next
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: What exactly is our CRC algorithm?