On Thu, Nov 8, 2018 at 4:36 AM Masahiko Sawada <sawada.mshk@gmail.com> wrote:
> We already have disable_page_skipping option, not (page_skipping
> false). So ISMT disable_index_cleanup would be more natural.
Sure.
> Also,
> since what to do with this option is not only skipping vacuum indexes
> but also skipping removeing dead tuples on heap, I think that the
> option should have a more understandable name for users indicating
> that both it removes dead tuples less than the normal vacuum and it's
> aimed to freeze tuple more faster. Of course we document them, though.
Well, I actually don't think that you should control two behaviors
with the same option. If you want to vacuum and skip index cleanup,
you should say VACUUM (disable_index_cleanup). If you want to vacuum,
disable index cleanup, and skip aggressively, you should say VACUUM
(freeze, disable_index_cleanup). Both behaviors seem useful.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
