Re: [PATCH] Unremovable tuple monitoring - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Robert Haas
Subject Re: [PATCH] Unremovable tuple monitoring
Date
Msg-id CA+TgmobYzJqxi5CT_yw7+1KULDiTc-DXTi8hZqVkin6ee0Mm2A@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [PATCH] Unremovable tuple monitoring  (Yeb Havinga <yebhavinga@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: [PATCH] Unremovable tuple monitoring
Re: [PATCH] Unremovable tuple monitoring
List pgsql-hackers
On Tue, Nov 15, 2011 at 10:05 AM, Yeb Havinga <yebhavinga@gmail.com> wrote:
> I reviewed your patch. I think it is in good shape, my two main remarks
> (name of n_unremovable_tup and a remark about documentation at the end of
> this review) are highly subjective and I wouldn't spend time on it unless
> other people have the same opinion.

I share your opinion; it's not obvious to me what this means either.
I guess this is a dumb question, but why don't we remove all the dead
tuples?

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Yeb Havinga
Date:
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Unremovable tuple monitoring
Next
From: Yeb Havinga
Date:
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Unremovable tuple monitoring