Re: Using defines for protocol characters - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Robert Haas
Subject Re: Using defines for protocol characters
Date
Msg-id CA+TgmobYkUJfwE85dsYU0HStK1QQ-cQvHGQ_r-uKdrG4Mph9WQ@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Using defines for protocol characters  (Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: Using defines for protocol characters
Re: Using defines for protocol characters
List pgsql-hackers
On Thu, Aug 17, 2023 at 12:13 PM Nathan Bossart
<nathandbossart@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 17, 2023 at 09:31:55AM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
> > Looks sensible seen from here.
>
> Thanks for taking a look.

I think this is going to be a major improvement in terms of readability!

I'm pretty happy with this version, too. We may be running out of
things to argue about -- and no, I don't want to argue about
underscores more!

--
Robert Haas
EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Nathan Bossart
Date:
Subject: Re: Using defines for protocol characters
Next
From: Dave Cramer
Date:
Subject: Re: Using defines for protocol characters