Re: Listing triggers in partitions (was Re: Remove mention in docsthat foreign keys on partitioned tables) - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Robert Haas
Subject Re: Listing triggers in partitions (was Re: Remove mention in docsthat foreign keys on partitioned tables)
Date
Msg-id CA+TgmobXy=D16yVtEX51ycdWHWacEen6f+VuAZK_mW1dLr1R4w@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Listing triggers in partitions (was Re: Remove mention in docsthat foreign keys on partitioned tables)  (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Fri, Jun 29, 2018 at 12:06 PM, Alvaro Herrera
<alvherre@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
> Okay, pushed that way.
>
> We can redo this if/when we add support for cloning BEFORE row triggers,
> which are going to need the trigger link info, I suspect.

Yeah, having an explicit representation seems less likely to be
fragile.  Following dependencies might not work if there's an extra
dependency that you aren't expecting for some reason.

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Peter Geoghegan
Date:
Subject: Re: mxid_age() and age(xid) appear undocumented
Next
From: Alvaro Herrera
Date:
Subject: Re: pgsql: Fix "base" snapshot handling in logical decoding