Re: Switch to multi-inserts for pg_depend - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Robert Haas
Subject Re: Switch to multi-inserts for pg_depend
Date
Msg-id CA+TgmobV8_D=wcj_C0fMMEEooX-FNT8i1TPU+3di0bWX0-cE=Q@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Switch to multi-inserts for pg_depend  (Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>)
Responses Re: Switch to multi-inserts for pg_depend  (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Tue, Aug 11, 2020 at 1:59 AM Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz> wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 10, 2020 at 05:32:21PM -0700, Andres Freund wrote:
> > Do we really want to end up with several separate defines for different
> > type of catalog batch inserts? That doesn't seem like a good
> > thing. Think there should be a single define for all catalog bulk
> > inserts.
>
> Unlikely so, but I kept them separate to potentially lower the
> threshold of 64kB for catalog rows that have a lower average size than
> pg_attribute.

Uh, why would we want to do that?

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Ashutosh Sharma
Date:
Subject: Re: recovering from "found xmin ... from before relfrozenxid ..."
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: remove spurious CREATE INDEX CONCURRENTLY wait