Re: Declarative partitioning - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Robert Haas
Subject Re: Declarative partitioning
Date
Msg-id CA+TgmobUi=u1TswwFoi+TU_+XZvJhTrxG-JgZ0OrJmOe7cX87g@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Declarative partitioning  (Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8@lab.ntt.co.jp>)
Responses Re: Declarative partitioning  (Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8@lab.ntt.co.jp>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Fri, Oct 30, 2015 at 6:08 AM, Amit Langote
<Langote_Amit_f8@lab.ntt.co.jp> wrote:
> The DDL and catalogs part are not much different from what I had last
> described though I took a few steps to simplify things. I dropped the
> multi-level partitioning bit

Hmm, that doesn't sound good to me.  I think multi-level partitioning
is a reasonably important use case.

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: proposal: multiple psql option -c
Next
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: FORCE ROW LEVEL SECURITY