Postgres Pro
Downloads
Home   >   mailing lists

Re: [HACKERS] new table partitioning breaks \d table to older versions - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Robert Haas
Subject Re: [HACKERS] new table partitioning breaks \d table to older versions
Date
Msg-id CA+TgmobU=abmEFJD7JNM+vR9OwVkw9mtbe7HJsTZ2jBa2jz5xA@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] new table partitioning breaks \d table to older versions  (Fabrízio de Royes Mello <fabriziomello@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Tree view 
On Fri, Dec 9, 2016 at 1:18 PM, Fabrízio de Royes Mello
<fabriziomello@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 9, 2016 at 3:59 PM, Jeff Janes <jeff.janes@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Since:
>> commit f0e44751d7175fa3394da2c8f85e3ceb3cdbfe63
>> Author: Robert Haas <rhaas@postgresql.org>
>> Date:   Wed Dec 7 13:17:43 2016 -0500
>>
>>     Implement table partitioning.
>>
>> If I use psql compiled from 10devel to connect to a 9.6.1 server, then \d
>> fails:
>>
>> psql (10devel-f0e4475, server 9.6.1-16e7c02)
>> Type "help" for help.
>>
>>
>> # \d pgbench_accounts
>> ERROR:  column c.relpartbound does not exist
>> LINE 1: ...ELECT inhparent::pg_catalog.regclass, pg_get_expr(c.relpartb...
>>
>
> Looks like they forgot to adjust version check number in describe.c code.
>
> Attched patch fix it.

Committed.

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Nested Wait Events?
Next
From: Dmitry Ivanov
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Declarative partitioning - another take