Re: A question about the psql \copy command - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Robert Haas
Subject Re: A question about the psql \copy command
Date
Msg-id CA+TgmobTXoCxC+-mE6XSPnTOCeo-AefS-yv2SvBjYxi6bFthOg@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to A question about the psql \copy command  ("Etsuro Fujita" <fujita.etsuro@lab.ntt.co.jp>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Thu, Feb 7, 2013 at 7:45 AM, Etsuro Fujita
<fujita.etsuro@lab.ntt.co.jp> wrote:
> Through the work on the patch [1], I had a question about the psql \copy
> command.  We are permitted 1) but not permitted 2):
> 1) \copy foo from stdin ;
> 2) \copy foo from stdin;
> Is this intentional?  I think it would be better to allow for 2).  Attached is a
> patch.

Sounds reasonable to me.

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: David Fetter
Date:
Subject: Re: Department of Redundancy Department: makeNode(FuncCall) division
Next
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: backup.sgml patch that adds information on custom format backups