Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Ensure that contrib/pgstattuple functions respond to cancel - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Robert Haas
Subject Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Ensure that contrib/pgstattuple functions respond to cancel
Date
Msg-id CA+TgmobTNbQ7SXfAQUfsvpCZdTTM7g=keisFHVj+=9WNLCFekg@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Ensure that contrib/pgstattuple functions respond to cancel  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 4:24 PM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 2, 2010 at 12:17 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@postgresql.org> wrote:
>> Log Message:
>> -----------
>> Ensure that contrib/pgstattuple functions respond to cancel interrupts
>> reasonably promptly, by adding CHECK_FOR_INTERRUPTS in the per-page loops.
>>
>> Tatsuhito Kasahara
>
> This patch seems to have overlooked pgstatindex().

Fixed.

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: checkpoints are duplicated even while the system is idle
Next
From: "Seiko Ishida (MP Tech Consulting LLC)"
Date:
Subject: Re: Action requested - Application Softblock implemented | Issue report ID341057