On Mon, Sep 15, 2014 at 2:18 PM, Peter Geoghegan <pg@heroku.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 15, 2014 at 11:12 AM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>> Personally I'd think that we should retain it for objects; Peter's
>> main argument against that was that the comment would be too complicated,
>> but that seems a bit silly from here.
>
> I just don't see any point to it. My argument against the complexity
> of explaining why the optimization is only used with objects is based
> on the costs and the benefits. I think the benefits are very close to
> nil.
That seems pessimistic to me; I'm with Tom.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
