On Mon, Mar 6, 2017 at 6:33 AM, Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 6, 2017 at 4:57 PM, Michael Banck <michael.banck@credativ.de> wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> On Thu, Feb 16, 2017 at 08:14:28AM +0530, Amit Kapila wrote:
>>> On Thu, Feb 16, 2017 at 12:27 AM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> > On Wed, Feb 15, 2017 at 1:39 PM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> >> On Wed, Feb 15, 2017 at 7:11 AM, Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com> wrote:>
>>> >>> support related patch. In anycase, to avoid confusion I am attaching
>>> >>> all the three patches with this e-mail.
>>> >>
>>> >> Committed guc_parallel_index_scan_v1.patch, with changes to the
>>> >> documentation and GUC descriptions.
>>> >
>>> > And committed parallel_index_opt_exec_support_v10.patch as well, with
>>> > a couple of minor tweaks.
>>>
>>> Thanks a lot! I think this is a big step forward for parallelism in
>>> PostgreSQL. Now, we have another way to drive parallel scans and I
>>> hope many more queries can use parallelism.
>>
>> Shouldn't the chapter 15.3 "Parallel Plans" in the documentation be
>> updated for this as well, or is this going to be taken care as a batch
>> at the ned of the development cycle, pending other added parallization
>> features?
>>
>
> Robert mentioned up thread that it is better to update it once at end
> rather than with each feature.
I was going to do it after index and index-only scans and parallel
bitmap heap scan were committed, but I've been holding off on
committing parallel bitmap heap scan waiting for Andres to fix the
simplehash regressions, so maybe I should just go do an update now and
another one later once that goes in.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
