Re: September 2012 commitfest - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Robert Haas
Subject Re: September 2012 commitfest
Date
Msg-id CA+TgmobR-tr-JMPK7NOosHWcL-Hn-TkYK9RmaNzKD36xa5uxNw@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: September 2012 commitfest  (Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>)
Responses Re: September 2012 commitfest  (Simon Riggs <simon@2ndQuadrant.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Thu, Oct 11, 2012 at 2:42 PM, Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net> wrote:
> I have a quietish few days starting on Saturday, will be looking at this
> then. Is it only the Windows aspect that needs reviewing? Are we more or
> less happy with the rest?

I think the Windows issues were the biggest thing, but I suspect there
may be a few other warts as well.  It's a lot of code, and it's
modifying pg_dump, which is an absolute guarantee that it's built on a
foundation made out of pure horse manure.

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Simon Riggs
Date:
Subject: Deprecating RULES
Next
From: Simon Riggs
Date:
Subject: Re: change in LOCK behavior