On Thu, May 5, 2016 at 10:48 AM, David Rowley
<david.rowley@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
> On 5 May 2016 at 16:04, David Rowley <david.rowley@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
>> I've started making some improvements to this, but need to talk to
>> Tomas. It's currently in the middle of his night, but will try to
>> catch him in his morning to discuss this with him.
>
> Ok, so I spoke to Tomas about this briefly, and he's asked me to send
> in this patch. He didn't get time to look over it due to some other
> commitments he has today.
>
> I do personally feel that if the attached is not good enough, or not
> very close to good enough then probably the best course of action is
> to revert the whole thing.
Tom, what do you think about this patch? Is it good enough, or should
we revert the whole thing?
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
