Re: poll: CHECK TRIGGER? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Robert Haas
Subject Re: poll: CHECK TRIGGER?
Date
Msg-id CA+TgmobPgOUTp_8W38j3NCYOWa-pd_7f-HDKKt1LAOxBiayLmw@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: poll: CHECK TRIGGER?  (Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Fri, Mar 9, 2012 at 5:31 PM, Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com> wrote:
> ok - it has sense, but it has sense only with some "smart" statements
> (like CHECK). Without these statements I have to directly call checker
> function and then  concept of generalised checkers has not sense.

I agree.

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: Publish checkpoint timing and sync files summary data to pg_stat_bgwriter
Next
From: Marko Kreen
Date:
Subject: Re: pg_crypto failures with llvm on OSX