Re: [HACKERS] Block level parallel vacuum - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Robert Haas
Subject Re: [HACKERS] Block level parallel vacuum
Date
Msg-id CA+TgmobP7VeUFC92Bi1O5E__iQtDSSrjvNrWHNNHyoYwLmWZZw@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] Block level parallel vacuum  (Masahiko Sawada <sawada.mshk@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Thu, Mar 14, 2019 at 3:37 AM Masahiko Sawada <sawada.mshk@gmail.com> wrote:
> Attached the updated patch you proposed and the patch that converts
> the grammer productions for the VACUUM option on top of the former
> patch. The latter patch moves VacuumOption to vacuum.h since the
> parser no longer needs such information.

Committed.

> If we take this direction I will change the parallel vacuum patch so
> that it adds new PARALLEL option and adds 'nworkers' to VacuumParams.

Sounds good.

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Peter Eisentraut
Date:
Subject: Re: Row Level Security − leakproof-ness and performance implications
Next
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: BUG #15641: Autoprewarm worker fails to start on Windows withhuge pages in use Old PostgreSQL community/pgsql-bugs x