Re: pg_retainxlog for inclusion in 9.3? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Robert Haas
Subject Re: pg_retainxlog for inclusion in 9.3?
Date
Msg-id CA+TgmobOfoDYhRvvTL5_2FnftauJo6tbC7dV_JwqiJyc2Vg8fw@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: pg_retainxlog for inclusion in 9.3?  (Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net>)
Responses Re: pg_retainxlog for inclusion in 9.3?
Re: pg_retainxlog for inclusion in 9.3?
List pgsql-hackers
On Thu, Jan 3, 2013 at 11:32 AM, Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net> wrote:
> Any particular reason? It goes pretty tightly together with
> pg_receivexlog, which is why I'd prefer putting it alongside that one.
> But if you have a good argument against it, I can change my mind :)

Mostly that it seems like a hack, and I suspect we may come up with a
better way to do this in the future.

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Charles Gomes
Date:
Subject: Re: Writing Trigger Functions in C
Next
From: Heikki Linnakangas
Date:
Subject: Re: PATCH: Split stats file per database WAS: autovacuum stress-testing our system