On Thu, Apr 2, 2015 at 10:57 AM, Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> wrote:
> Uh, I didn't see a huge amount of discussion, but I guess it is
> sufficient:
>
> http://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/20150109191551.GA32660@fetter.org#20150109191551.GA32660@fetter.org
There are at least a dozen messages on that thread that are entirely
dedicated to whether this should be back-patched. How much discussion
did you want?
Now, mind you, my view did not prevail, so I can't be completely happy
with the outcome, but I was in the minority. At least the version
that broke essentially the entire build-farm only went into master, so
that's something.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
