On Wed, Dec 14, 2011 at 9:05 AM, Alvaro Herrera
<alvherre@commandprompt.com> wrote:
> Excerpts from Dimitri Fontaine's message of mié dic 14 07:22:21 -0300 2011:
>> Again, that's a caveat of the first implementation, you can't have sub
>> commands support without forcing them through ProcessUtility and that's
>> a much more invasive patch. Maybe we will need that later.
>
> I can get behind this argument: force all stuff through ProcessUtility
> for regularity, and not necessarily in the first patch for this feature.
That seems like a pretty heavy dependency on an implementation detail
that we might want to change at some point.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
